Lens basics for photographers

Lens basics for photographers
Given that urban base soon 2 years it is.
Has written numerous technical articles on more or less high specialist or level of news.
....A clear statement.
So I let nothing spoil me by urban base,.
even though he senior portraits now making fun something on the Forum...
I think if you ever lose the smile in the corner of the mouth not
can you win also such stories something nice.
On the subject of preference for a lens:
Each lens has its sweets and his sours.

In fact, just getting the lens of my preference is attached.
That's a good thing, because otherwise I would have to go Yes all the time.
Much on it I had it the 28-200 on APSC which is 18-135 on FX.
Each lenses without wobbling electronics...
He would deal, he would write not such Flatnesses, because one wants to simply generate traffic without effort
what people are actually the benefits the lenses from canon with red ring? times are a whole corner more expensive than "normal"
I have also the lenses without standard red ring.
A red ring is Canon a Gütesiegl have an L in the name.
And they get funny about the Red Ring because there are photographers, or those who believe to be fotografiern photographer with such lenses now and believe to be able to take good pictures with them!
Skanter also with an L and red ring are normal lenses only will and more calculated.
If you use a lens properly you can make good photos even with cheap.
Who has a photographic equipment to €10,000 and can take pictures not get any good pictures.
One dealing with photography and his eye guilt and the basics mastered economic also with a disposable camera ($ a few film) produce pleasing images.